Matthew Bryant is secretary of GFW Writers group and also is our in-house professor of the new Grammar Etiquette blog series, posted the second Wednesday of every month. He is an English teacher in Denton, TX. When he isn't teaching he is ghost writing and working on his novel. He says with small children he has learned to write fast.
If you have a question or a comment, please leave it in the comment section at the end of this article.
As
early as grade school, teachers begin driving systems into our heads. The first thing that comes to mind is the
wondrous MLA format. Did you just
cringe? I do hope so. As an English teacher, a lot of students will
ask me about this. And to be perfectly
honest, I don’t require it. But as an
experienced educator, I understand its purpose.
In
order to get their children out of bed and ready for the day, there’s a certain
routine that they follow. In any order,
it involves getting up, eating breakfast, putting on clothes, brushing teeth,
brushing hair, and getting everything together to take with them. This routine, when copied enough times,
becomes paramount. Not only does it make
things easier on the parent, who needs to get out of the house on time to get
their own day going, but it institutes these ideas into the child’s head for
when they grow up and need to get themselves ready.
The
same is true in writing. MLA format,
while it sends dark chills down my spine at the overall blandness of it, brings
about the necessity of a proper flow in writing. Establishing an idea, then following through
with reason and example is how people prefer to read things. It adds a level of comfort and understanding
to the reader/listener so that it makes it easier to follow. Attempts to stray from some sense of
organization will often add an unnecessary complexity that leads to a loss of
interest or an inability to keep up.
The
same is true in writing. If you’re going
to implement something into a story, it’s more often than not going to require
some sort of explanation. This reasoning
should, in terms of flow, come soon after the action. Explain it before hand and you’ll be sending
them back to retrace their steps instead of moving forward. Explain it too late and the audience is left
dwelling on the confusion of this instance instead of paying attention to
anything that may be occurring between point A and point B.
Does
this mean that everything should happen sequentially? No, not at all. A perfect example would be Audrey Niffenegger’s
novel, The Time Traveler’s Wife. While the story in no way goes in order,
jumping around like a cracked-out monkey in a trampoline emporium, the story
unfolds in a logical manner. It’s
written in such a way that it’s easy to follow, but the time warps allow for
several ‘Eureka’ moments, springing connections on the reader in a way that
explains previous happenings that seemed of little importance previously, but
now mean so much more that they’ve been linked.
So back
to my students. I don’t require MLA
format because it’s just a suggestion. I
want them to be able to establish flow on their own. If it’s proven that they are incapable of
this, then I’ll recommend they go back to the basics. If not, I feel like being stuck within this
format inhibits their creativity. I’ve
had freshmen write out essays that ran for three pages and the flow actually
followed the ideals of a rising action and climax within their expository
piece. These moments make my heart swell
with pride.
I’ve
also had seniors turn in three paragraphs out of order. So as you can see: win some, lose some. This is why pre-drafts are so important. As much as I love writing by the seat of my
pants, about halfway through my novels I end up writing out a timeline (that I
sometimes follow). By the second draft,
however, I always ensure that I have ample notes to insure that proper
information is delivered at an acceptable time.
Just because the story flows sequentially doesn’t mean that the ideas
and information do as well.
8 comments:
Ugh this stuff always kicks my butt. Thanx for the helpful info!!!
What a great explanation! Maybe this is why backstory or info dumps ruin flow. Maybe when a critiquer says "this paragraph takes me out of the story", they're really saying it stops the flow of the story or it's in the wrong place.
This is such a great topic. I'm always writing a page or two then moving it later to another spot. It feels like having all the pieces to a jigsaw sometimes, and trying to piece it together. Its so easy to forget that the reader can't see the images in our own head, so laying the story out for them to get them to where we are is the challange. You always make me think and see the process of writing in a new light M.B. :) Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for the comments guys! Remember Jen, with enough hammering, puzzle pieces can go ANYWHERE! ;)
Good stuff Matthew. Sometimes true flow requires the story to clot though. I enjoy a good non-linear progression in a story, but they are rare, and really hard to pull off. So, the answer my friend, is flowing in the wind, the answer is...
What's not to like about an article on flow describing out-of-order as "jumping around like a cracked-out monkey in a trampoline emporium."
Thank you. I'm saving this one.
"I don’t require MLA format because it’s just a suggestion. I want them to be able to establish flow on their own. If it’s proven that they are incapable of this, then I’ll recommend they go back to the basics."
I wish my professors in college were more like this! Refreshing....and makes sense.
Imagine my chagrin when I get to journalism school knowing MLA backwards and forwards and then being force-fed AP Style. Talk about a cracked out monkey on a trampoline ...
Post a Comment